Thursday, July 24, 2008

July Exhibition at Plus Gallery

July’s exhibition at Plus Gallery fully immerses itself into cutting edge conceptual artwork with Tsehai Johnson’s Disorderly and Andy Miller’s Flat and Empty. The gallery space has been opened up to allow these powerful pieces to unfold from the walls and floor. Both artists have chosen to show sprawling ground pieces that effectively give the show an undeniable kinetic energy. In addition to the layout of sculptural works supplying vigor to the exhibition, saturated hues also elevate the shows presence. Andy’s subdued red, yellow, and orange intensify Tsehai’s bold palette. The juxtaposition of Tsehai’s highly articulated forms are strengthened against Andy’s large bulky biomorphic shapes. Additionally, the motives in creating the art sharply contrast one another as well. Andy is driven by material and his personal perception of ambiguous organic shapes. Tsehai uses her art to create tension through personal responses from her audiences by presenting seemingly identifiable forms in asymmetrical patterns. The two shows crescendo each other wonderfully and create a powerful exhibition.
When looking at Tsehai Johnson’s pieces, one can see her demonstrate an impeccable skill with working porcelain. The layouts of the pieces illustrate an amazing sensibility in creating interesting compositions that allow for “discovery”. Her inspiration sites her intellectual insight to personal discourses as she teases out individualized reactions through loosely identifiably objects. Her wall shifts draw from Baroque wallpaper and organic forms pulled from chaotic instances that occur within nature. By creating a hybridization of these two ideas, Tsehai calls to question where the fine line lies between organized beauty and anarchic occurrences. At first glance, her wall shifts appear to be somewhat symmetrical; upon closer inspection one can find each individual piece is actually asymmetrical. It is only through visual balance and subtle similarities that these pieces appear to be a set pattern.


Tsehai choose shapes that can distantly be affiliated with actual objects pending on the viewer. This creates a dynamic tension through utilizing shapes that fall just short of something actual and something imagined. In turn, each individual is forced to carve out his or her own understanding to the piece and how the series relates as a whole.
The color palette, placement of components, as well as the organization of the pieces has evolved in this series in comparison to previous bodies of works. Tsehai states that these aesthetic choices are meant to illustrate the playfulness of these wall shifts. The magnetic bright colors are used to highlight how these works draw from a childlike imagination. The hues also helps generate visual interest by making the viewer question what mediums where employed to create the pieces. Another intriguing aspect to these works are the “floating” components which hang from fishing wire and hover above Exploding Carpet.

The surreal effect is somewhat nerve racking as these obviously weighty pieces of porcelain are suspended above the cement floor. By employing these approaches, disorderly creates a deeply personal experience that leads to endless exploration.
Andy Miller’s current show Flat and Empty is by far the artists most conceptual body of work to date. A divergence from his prior exhibitions is evident as hard edges and industrial materials give way to biomorphic shapes rendered in a muted organic palette. The majority of the pieces hang from the walls in large drooping sweeps that allow light to play on the surface to create intriguing curvaceous shadows.

Along with the work itself, the process used to execute it has undergone a transformation as well. Similarly to the pieces, ridged formatting such as intense preliminary sketches and blue prints have been abandoned for an intuitive methodology. With these incorporations, the pieces move into a naturalistic fluidity which creates an in depth dialogue between the audience and the work.
Organic shapes and hues have always been a focal interest for Andy Miller; however, they have not been fully expressed until now. All aspects of life have the capacity to bleed into an artist’s artwork and frequently do. This statement holds true for Andy as his fabrication and design work has visibly taken root within his pieces prior to this July’s exhibition. He sites his strong architectural design; sheen industrial materials and the symbolic references where derived from his fabrication work and had been subconsciously interjected into his pieces. This seemingly deviating exploration of biomorphic shapes was spurred to center stage by a recent proposal devised by Andy for a public sculpture. He made it a point to gravitate away from precise angles and highly saturated colors and towards macrobiotic allusion. This conceptual design subsequently then segwayed Andy into the current series Flat and Empty. Andy’s concerted efforts to maintain to naturalistic attributes found within the environment can be considered successful ones. However, structural motifs seem to inherently emerge in the diptych piece Flat and Empty #4 (green and yellow). Andy stated that these where the last pieces to be created within the series and his will to create strictly organic designs must have began to wane.
With out a doubt Flat and Empty exercises Andy Miller’s ability to manipulate unusual materials that create ominous forms that weld a commanding presence. This series has certainly opened doors to new ideas for the future not only with the process and installation but with the media as well. However, Andy states that he never feels truly finished with any series and always has the intentions of revisiting past series to expand upon them. On this note, it will be beyond interesting to see what is on the horizon for this exceptional conceptual artist.
Both shows will run from July 18th through August 23rd and are must to see in person to experience the full impact the exhibition.

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Robin Schaefer Interview














Robin Schaefer




Brittany: You stated at your artist talk that you paint both from life and photo references. As you are executing your works, are there stages where one is used more than the other?

Robin Schaefer: While I am painting I use photo references. This is partly because my paintings develop slowly over time and the subjects I like to paint would decompose. I also like to capture a certain quality of light in my paintings and by taking photographs of the object I can capture that moment.

Brittany: Why do you choose to work using both of these approaches?

Robin Schaefer: I think both are helpful and challenging in different ways. I appreciate the spontaneity that comes from working from life. It is important to change your approach at times and experiment as an artist.

Brittany: Light seems to be another heavy factor within your works as well. Do you see the reflective images that have emerged within your recent pieces as being an extension of this fascination with light?

Robin Schaefer: Light is important in my paintings and I feel it is still a factor in the reflection pieces. I am continuously fascinated with how light can evoke emotion and the reflections add a new element to that. The type of light I use in the reflection pieces is actually very specific. It is from an exact time of day just before sunset and it created this really beautiful ghost like reflection. I studied the way the reflections changed through out the day in various sources of light until I found the right time and effect that I wanted.

Brittany: A large number of your pieces have a very dark if not black background. Do you do this as a stylistic choice, a tool to emphasize your highly saturated hues, or is it apart of a symbolic reference?

Robin Schaefer: The black background is a stylistic choice. It emphasizes the object in the painting and intensifies the fact that the object is isolated. It is dramatic and it makes the space feel infinite. It recedes back. As if you could reach your hand into it. It also references Dutch still life, which use primarily black backgrounds.

Brittany: Predominately in historic still life paintings the viewer is placed a good distance above the objects and looks down upon them. In contrast, your works seem to move the viewer right at or ever so slightly below or above eye level. Is this motif an intentional one? If so, what are you trying to evoke from your audience when you place them at this viewpoint.

Robin Schaefer: I choose a viewpoint that is meant to be engaging and somewhat unsettling. The subject matter is always blown up to be much larger than life and tends to dominate the space on the canvas. I also really want the viewer to notice the details of the subject and its unusual characteristics so I tend to place the object more at eye level.

Brittany: When looking at your body of works as a whole, it is clear that you are continuing with more or less solid thematic ideas that involve organic items and the play of light. The bottle cap paintings appear to be a slight divergence from this due to their synthetic makeup and their reflections that make them a little ambiguous to the viewer. Do you possibly see these as opening a new door to your next series?

Robin Schaefer: I definitely feel that the bottle caps opened up a new door for me and I intend to use them in my next series. I like the ambiguity that they evoke and it is interesting that they still have an organic feel to them. I am also really intrigued with how they seem to fuse realism and abstraction.

Brittany: When choosing your subject matter, are you more interested in the significance that the object can carry or the color and surface quality of the item?

Robin Schaefer: Both of these are a factor in the subjects I choose. However, initially I am drawn to the texture and color of the object. I like to choose subjects that are sensual but also unusual and a lot of that has to do with their texture and color. The white asparagus is a good example.

Brittany: Within your pieces it seems fairly evident that you are attracted to organic forms and the symbolic connotations that they can carry. Can you elaborate how you draw this connection between the chosen imagery and the thoughts, feelings, and ideas that you are trying to convey?

Robin Schaefer: I often start with an emotion I want to convey and then I search for imagery that I feel will fit with that. The potato paintings, for example are about shyness. I new I wanted to do a series on the subject of shyness and insecurity but it took me months to find the right subject matter. In fact I stumbled upon the potatoes one day when my friend was cleaning out her cupboard. They were so shocking and bizarre and they had this quality of being extremely ugly and yet beautiful. The fact that they were growing in the dark was also very symbolic to me. This seemed to parallel the feeling of being shy. Wanting to hide but also wanting to break out and transform. I feel it is very provoking to use organic subject matter to convey my ideas and feelings because that are around us and sustain us on a daily basis. So in a way it is more engaging to see them isolated in a space and blown up larger than life. They become very monumental.

Brittany: What is your favorite fruit?

Robin Schaefer: Lychee

Brittany: What is your favorite color?

Robin Schaefer: Red